Skip to main content
· 9/2/1970

Sherwood v. Nissen

Citations

  • 179 N.W.2d 336
  • 1970 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing, if the moving party has not met his or her burden, he or she is not entitled to summary judgment
  • “Some ultimate facts lend themselves more readily to categorical proof than others. A plaintiff suing on a note is usually in a considerably different position than a plaintiff suing for negligence.”
  • “Frequently the question on motions for summary judgment is whether the showing in resistance to the motion is adequate. Here, however, the question is whether the showing in support of the motion was sufficient in the first place.” (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.