Sherwood B. Korssjoen, Inc. v. Heiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a ring purchased by the wife was not a family expense but, rather, “must be treated as any other ring, for mere personal gratification and adornment”
• the Illinois family expense law was taken from a statute in Iowa

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).