Skip to main content
· 10/21/1998

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Johnson

Citations

  • 989 S.W.2d 710
  • 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using terms such as “hyper-inflated sales factor” and “absurdity” in describing the tax apportionment of similar inter-business treasury department techniques from cases in New Jersey and Indiana
  • describing variance statute as “bilateral”
  • describing variance statute as ―bilateral‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William B. Cain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.