Skip to main content
· 11/24/1998

Sherry L. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 160 F.3d 1247
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 11954
  • 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2419
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 85
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8621
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 29835
  • 1998 WL 809547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that special circumstances could warrant a conclusion of practical finality in regard to a partial summary judgment order
  • stating that special circumstances could warrant a conclusion of practical finality in regard to a partial summary judgment order
  • noting that, 20 barring special circumstances, orders granting partial summary judgment are not appealable final 21 orders
  • analyzing appellate jurisdiction before determining whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction
  • “The issue of appellate jurisdiction must always be resolved before the merits of an appeal are examined or addressed.” (citation omitted)
  • “The final judgment rule, which is embodied in 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 11 empowers the circuit courts to hear appeals from all final judgments issued by the district courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brunetti, Fernandez, McKeown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.