Sherrill v. Royal Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that denial of the entire basic retirement benefit was a deprivation subject to due process protection
• when evaluating eligibility for disability retirement benefits, the responsibility of city-appointed physicians “was to make a medical judgment, not to function as adversaries or advocates”
• “[T]he value of cross-examination to discredit a professional medical opinion at best is limited.”
• former city employee’s interest in “accident disability retirement benefits” was a property interest
• property right based on Administrative Code of City of New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).