Sherrill v. Mallicote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting aside the conveyance because the facts showed that the “transfer was made with the fraudulent intent to defeat the widow of her distributive share”
• “In cases of this type there can be no fixed rule of determining when a transfer or gift is fraudulent to a wife; each case must be determined on its own facts and circumstances.”
• “In cases of this type there can be no fixed rule of determining when a transfer or gift is fraudulent to a wife; each case must be determined on its own facts and circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).