Sherrie L. Durham v. Bill Haslam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the relevant consideration is whether the employee’s engaging in protected activity “contributed to the decision to fire [him]”
• plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of retaliation by proving that the reason she was fired was false
• “Another form of circumstantial evidence that is probative of retaliatory motive is ‘[p]roof that the defendant’s [proffered] explanation is unworthy of credence.” (alterations in original) (quoting Lomax v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 243 S.W.3d 474, 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).