Skip to main content
· 6/10/1997

Sherri L. Helfter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 115 F.3d 613
  • 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1499
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13590
  • 1997 WL 307016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court did not err in discounting conclusory statements in affidavits or deposition testimony in assessing whether claimant was substantially limited in a major life activity
  • holding employee's conclusory summary judgment affidavit insufficient to withstand properly supported motion for summary judgment
  • holding conclusory statements in affidavit, standing alone, are insufficient to withstand properly supported motion for summary judgment
  • holding conclusory statements in affidavits and deposition testimony, “standing alone, are insufficient to withstand a properly-supported motion for summary judgment”
  • holding conclusory statements in affidavit, standing alone, are insufficient to withstand properly supported motion for summary judgment
  • holding conclusory statements in affidavit, standing -14- alone, are insufficient to withstand a properly supported motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Arnold, Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.