Sherome Hankton v. the State of Louisiana, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans (University Hospital), Through the Board of Supervisors at Louisiana State University and Dr. John Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements in closing argument that conveyed the prose- cutor’s own beliefs on credibility were improper
• statements in closing argument that conveyed the prose- cutor’s own beliefs on credibility were improper
• the pros- ecutor’s “repeated statements” that were improper necessi- tated reversal
• the pros- ecutor’s “repeated statements” that were improper necessi- tated reversal
• “[The] prosecutor’s repeated inappropriate statements of the prosecutor’s personal view that defendant was a liar were so prejudicial that, if defendant had objected and moved for a mistrial, the trial court would have abused its discretion in denying the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).