Skip to main content
· 12/24/1992

Shermoen v. United States

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 1312
  • 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 737
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 17283
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10277
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “finding that a party is necessary to the action is predicated only on that party having a claim to an interest”
  • stating the factors that courts consider under Rule 24(a) in the context of determining adequacy under Rule 19(a)
  • “Because of the threat to the absent tribes’ legal entitlements, and indeed to their sovereignty, posed by the present litigation, application of the public rights exception . . . would be inappropriate.”
  • \The moving party has the burden of persuasion in arguing for dismissal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.