Sherman White v. Crispus Nix Rob Glaser John Emmett James Burton Unknown/unnamed Sued as Two Unknown Bci Agents

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the discretionary resolution of discovery issues precludes the requisite controlling question of law”
• concluding that the absence of precedent directly dealing with the issue at hand does not constitute a substantial ground for difference of opinion
• concluding that case law concerning the discovery of confidential investigative files during prison disciplinary hearings \uniformly\ sets certain conditions on an inmate's counsel's access to such files
• holding that even when \the parties did not raise any jurisdictional issues [the] court is obligated to raise such jurisdictional issues if it perceives any\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting that “the discretionary resolution of discovery issues precludes the requisite controlling question of law” requirement
• noting that “identification of a sufficient number of conflicting and contradictory opinions would provide substantial ground for disagreement” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).