South Dakota Supreme Court· 6/26/1909
Sherman v. Sherman
Citations
- 23 S.D. 486
- 122 N.W. 439
- 1909 S.D. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deed discharged and forever released the grantors from all claims whatsoever
- “There is nothing in the instrument in question reserving in the grantors any use of or dominion over the land, nor any provision whereby the grantors might reenter or resume possession in case it was not used for railway purposes.”
- deed discharged and forever released the grantors from all claims whatsoever
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corson, McCoy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ThompsonEighth Circuit· 1939-12-04· cited 27×
- Gilbert v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1911-01-12· cited 21×
- Knoell v. Frisco Lease, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1935-06-14· cited 7×
- Nystrom v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1960-09-08· cited 6×
- Tripp v. F & K ASSAM FAMILY, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-08-06· cited 5×
- Hedger v. Aberdeen, B. & N. W. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-11-26· cited 5×
- Carter Oil Co. v. WelkerE.D. Illinois· 1938-10-13· cited 5×
- Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-08· cited 2×
- Rudolph v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1918-09-03· cited 1×
- Swaby v. NORTHERN HILLS REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTH.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-08
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court· 1876-12-18· cited 222×
- Lance's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-05-13· cited 61×
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-05-15· cited 52×
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-03-06· cited 39×
- Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 37×
- Robinson v. Missisquoi R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1887-01-15· cited 35×
- Flaten v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-12-08· cited 31×
- Lyon v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court· 1890-06-24· cited 29×
- Zuchtmann v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-11-15· cited 18×
- Brown v. Banner Coal & Coal Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1880-06-12· cited 15×
- Fitchburg Railroad v. FrostMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-05-07· cited 13×
- Parker v. RandolphSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-07-18· cited 12×
- Burleigh v. HechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-07-22· cited 12×
- City of Huron v. WilcoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1904-02-03· cited 10×
- Soukup v. TopkaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-06-29· cited 10×
- Forney v. FremontNebraska Supreme Court· 1888-01-15· cited 8×
- Hawes v. MarchantU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island· 1852-06-15· cited 4×
- Roby v. YatesNew York Supreme Court· 1893-06-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.