Sherman v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the matter would have been dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction had diversity of citizenship not provided an alternate jurisdictional basis
• granting substitute trustee’s motion to dismiss because there were no substantive allegations alleged against it
• “[D]istrict courts have uniformly rejected the proposition that plaintiffs have standing to sue under HAMP, under a third[]party beneficiary theory or otherwise.”
• “[District courts have uniformly rejected the proposition that plaintiffs have standing to sue under HAMP, under a third[]party beneficiary theory or otherwise.”
• where plaintiff sought preliminary injunction to prevent foreclosure sale, amount in controversy met due to “manifest fact” that the value of the property exceeded $75,000
• no private right of action under HAMP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).