D. Nevada· 10/10/1991
Sherman v. Griepentrog
Citations
- 775 F. Supp. 1383
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15336
- 1991 WL 216797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘It is not necessary that the 11 members of the class be so clearly identified that any member can be presently 12 ascertained.’ The court may draw a reasonable inference of the size of the class from the 13 facts before it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alberto v. GMRI, Inc.E.D. California· 2008-06-24· cited 102×
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-13· cited 36×
- Estate of Krueger Ex Rel. Krueger v. Richland County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-12-20· cited 19×
- Lamore v. IvesFirst Circuit· 1992-10-20· cited 17×
- Novella v. Westchester CountyS.D. New York· 2006-08-02· cited 10×
- STATE, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE v. EstabrookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-13· cited 9×
- Edwards v. GriepentrogD. Nevada· 1991-12-18· cited 8×
- Edwards v. GriepentrogD. Nevada· 1992-10-23· cited 6×
- Inman v. SullivanS.D. Indiana· 1992-12-17· cited 5×
- Cordall v. STATE EX REL. DVA AND SHSCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-09· cited 4×
- Perley v. PalmerN.D. Iowa· 1994-04-21· cited 3×
- Buchanan Ex Rel. Buchanan v. WhitemanD. Kansas· 1995-02-28· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1992-10-20
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,888×
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 656×
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1976-03-01· cited 628×
- Board of School Comm'rs of Indianapolis v. JacobsSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 368×
- Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1977-11-25· cited 251×
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1982-02-24· cited 240×
- Friedman v. BergerSupreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 135×
- Herweg v. RaySupreme Court· 1983-10-31· cited 116×
- 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 80, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15,133 Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 1984-02-22· cited 101×
- Aubrey J. CROSS and John Lee Parks, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1977-04-21· cited 96×
- Ruth Friedman v. Stephen Berger, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social ServicesSecond Circuit· 1976-12-08· cited 85×
- 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-IntervenorsNinth Circuit· 1978-04-03· cited 83×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo OmiyaNinth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 79×
- County of Los Angeles v. JordanSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 59×
- Cassell Carpenter v. Russell C. Davis, Mayor of JacksonFifth Circuit· 1970-04-09· cited 52×
- Anson Graves v. Walton County Board of Education, Cross-Appellants v. Veda J. Baker, Intervenors-Appellants, Cross-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1982-09-27· cited 32×
- Evelyn M. Summy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 1982-09-27· cited 26×
- Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.C.D. California· 1969-12-17· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.