Skip to main content
· 6/21/2006

Sherman v. Deihl

Citations

  • 193 S.W.3d 863
  • 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 875
  • 2006 WL 1688415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “parol evidence rule constitutes substantive law, and not merely an evidentiary rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nancy Steffen Rahmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.