Skip to main content
· 5/24/2000

Sherman v. AI/FOCS, INC.

Citations

  • 113 F. Supp. 2d 65
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16584
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,336
  • 2000 WL 1434774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding direct evidence of FMLA interference where employer expected plaintiff to work throughout her FMLA leave and terminated her for failing to do so
  • noting it is FMLA interference to condition leave on the willingness to remain “on call” or to fire an employee for not responding to telephone calls or performing work while on FMLA leave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.