Sherman H. Skolnick v. Albert E. Hallett and Harry G. Fins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court was “fully warranted in striking” a pro se complaint, which “was replete with scurrilous, offensive and objectionable allegations principally leveled at [the state court judge]” (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f
• striking a complaint in which plaintiff alleges that defendants conducted a ‘kangaroo court’ with him as a victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).