Sherman & Co. v. Salton Maxim Housewares, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there is no violation of section 2701 [by] a person with authorized access to the database no matter how malicious or larcenous his intended use of that access”
• no 10 violation “for a person with authorized access to the database no matter how 11 malicious or larcenous his intended use of that access” because “[s]ection 2701 12 outlaws illegal entry, not larceny”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).