Sherman Clay & Co. v. Lindman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding expert testimony to be of little weight because it was based on a eonclusory expert report that lacked independent analysis
• declining to exclude an expert report where failure to comply with Rule 26 was harmless
• “A plaintiff seeking to establish a government taking of an easement by flooding must demonstrate * * * that the flooding is intermittent, frequent, and inevitably recurring”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).