Sherley v. Seabold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, on the facts of that case, defense counsel could not have been reasonably expected to second-guess the psychiatrist's diagnosis
• explaining that, on the facts of that case, defense counsel could not have been reasonably expected to second-guess the psychiatrist's diagnosis
• attorney’s failure to present exculpatory evidence is ordinarily deficient \unless some cogent tactical or other consideration justified it.\
• retroactive application of Payne would not violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).