Sherk v. Sherk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that affidavit in form of questionnaire and cashflow worksheet affirmed by plaintiff were “of the ... bland, self-serving, non-probative, unsupported variety [that] clearly fall short of the sufficient showing” requirements
• stating that “self-serving, unsupported” affidavits are not sufficient to establish net worth
• holding self-serving and unsupported affidavits fail to establish a party’s net worth
• requiring “supporting documentary evidence” to establish eligibility for EAJA fees (quoting Fields v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 376, 382 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).