Skip to main content
· 4/29/1983

Sheriff of Washoe County v. Martin

Citations

  • 662 P.2d 634
  • 99 Nev. 336
  • 1983 Nev. LEXIS 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A challenger who has engaged in conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.\
  • \A challenger who has engaged in conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.\
  • construing the term “cheat” in light of its statutory purpose
  • construing the term \cheat\ in light of its statutory purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mowbray, Manoukian, Springer, Steffen, Gunderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.