District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/13/2001
Sheridan v. State
Citations
- 799 So. 2d 223
- 2001 WL 788097
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the prosecutor “repeatedly made improper statements during closing argument, including the reference to a defense theory as ‘desperate’ ”
- expressing concerns over improper prosecutorial - 33 - comments that a defense strategy was “desperate”
- expressing concerns over improper prosecutorial comments that a defense strategy was “desperate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salcines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patrick Albert Evans v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-11-12· cited 38×
- Wiley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-18· cited 21×
- Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-26· cited 11×
- Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-10
- Neeley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-17
- Malik v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-01
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Voorhees v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-19· cited 78×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 23×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-21· cited 7×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-31· cited 4×
- Elkin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.