Skip to main content

Sheridan v. State

Citations

  • 799 So. 2d 223
  • 2001 WL 788097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the prosecutor “repeatedly made improper statements during closing argument, including the reference to a defense theory as ‘desperate’ ”
  • expressing concerns over improper prosecutorial - 33 - comments that a defense strategy was “desperate”
  • expressing concerns over improper prosecutorial comments that a defense strategy was “desperate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salcines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.