Sheridan v. Planning Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no appeal lies from planning board unless its action is ‘‘binding without further action by a zoning commission or other municipal agency’’
• stating that a floating zone “meets the need for flexibility in modern zoning ordinances.”
• \`Allegations and proof of mere generalizations and fears are not enough to establish aggrievement'\
• “[w]ith the exception of certain provisions contained in chapters 124 and 126 of the General Statutes . . . planning and zoning in Stamford are governed by . . . the Stamford charter [1953], rather than by the General Statutes”
• “the floating zone is the product of legislative action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).