Sheridan v. Martinsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court held that defendants could not raise an issue under the guise of a Rule 60[b] motion that had already been decided against them in the original proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McKay v. Wilderness Development, LLC
  Montana Supreme Court· 2009-11-27· cited 15×
• Donovan v. Graff
  Montana Supreme Court· 1991-03-28· cited 12×
• Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. Gross
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-11-06· cited 11×
• Reinke v. Biegel
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-12-27· cited 7×
• Zions First National Bank v. World of Fitness, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-05-11· cited 4×
• Donaca v. Ivall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-21· cited 4×
• McKAY v. WILDERNESS DEVELOPMENT
  Montana Supreme Court· 2009-11-27