Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s directed verdict in favor of the defendant on Sheridan Drive-In Theatre’s private nuisance claim based on the lack of damages and evidence of an actionable nuisance, based on the extraordinary and unusual nature of the drive-in’s property use
• “A mere personal inconvenience or injury, such as damage to a business, is not sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).