Sheri Trozzi v. Lake County, Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the two-element Farmer analysis, after Kingsley and Brawner, becomes a three-element analysis when the plaintiff is a pretrial detainee, one element regarding the seriousness of the risk and two elements capturing the new subjective requirements
• noting that “a mere difference of opinion about the proper course of treatment . . . is not enough to establish deliberate indifference”
• noting that, to overcome qualified immunity, plaintiffs must identify “closely analogous precedent”
• explaining that “a detainee raising a Fourteenth Amendment medical deprivation claim must show that a reasonable officer at the scene—not one with the 20/20 vision of hindsight—would have known the detainee’s medical needs posed an excessive risk.”
• discussing how the Supreme Court has since rejected Estelle’s understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the notorious “evolving standards of decency” rubric
• discussing how the Supreme Court has since rejected Estelle’s understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the notorious “evolving standards of decency” rubric

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).