Sixth Circuit· 3/29/2022

Sheri Trozzi v. Lake County, Ohio

Citations

29 F.4th 745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the two-element Farmer analysis, after Kingsley and Brawner, becomes a three-element analysis when the plaintiff is a pretrial detainee, one element regarding the seriousness of the risk and two elements capturing the new subjective requirements
noting that “a mere difference of opinion about the proper course of treatment . . . is not enough to establish deliberate indifference”
noting that, to overcome qualified immunity, plaintiffs must identify “closely analogous precedent”
explaining that “a detainee raising a Fourteenth Amendment medical deprivation claim must show that a reasonable officer at the scene—not one with the 20/20 vision of hindsight—would have known the detainee’s medical needs posed an excessive risk.”
discussing how the Supreme Court has since rejected Estelle’s understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the notorious “evolving standards of decency” rubric
discussing how the Supreme Court has since rejected Estelle’s understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the notorious “evolving standards of decency” rubric

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.