Sherbrooke Turf, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the DOT regulations, on their face, satisfy the Supreme Court’s narrow tailoring requirements”
• concluding that “the DOT regulations, on their face, satisfy the Supreme Court’s narrow tailoring requirements”
• stating that plaintiffs “have the ultimate burden of establishing that the DBE program is not narrowly tailored”
• “the regulations place strong emphasis on the use of race-neutral means” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “the regulations place strong emphasis on the use of race-neutral means” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Congress has spent decades compiling evidence of race discrimination in government highway contracting, of barriers to the formation of minority-owned construction businesses, and of barriers to entry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).