Sheppard v. Krol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• legal malpractice claim properly dismissed where plaintiff failed to allege facts in his complaint demonstrating that he would have prevailed in the underlying suit
• legal malpractice claim properly dismissed where plaintiff failed to allege facts in his complaint demonstrating that he would have prevailed in the underlying suit
• “[W]e must consider whether plaintiff's legal malpractice complaint alleged the facts to establish he not only had a valid product liability cause of action, but that he would have been successful in that cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).