Shepherd Components, Inc. v. Brice Petrides-Donohue & Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others because engineer had no right to control work performed and only had \responsibility for quality control\
• concluding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others because engineer had no right to control work performed and only had “responsibility for quality control”
• deciding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others and, therefore, could not be liable for negligence of general contractor regarding safety procedures used on construction site
• deciding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others and, therefore, could not be liable for negligence of general contractor regarding safety procedures used on construction site
• concluding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others because engineer had no right to control work performed and only had \responsibility for quality control\
• concluding that engineer did not owe duty of care to others because engineer had no right to control work performed and only had “responsibility for quality control”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).