Idaho Supreme Court· 5/19/1972
Shepard v. Shepard
Citations
- 497 P.2d 321
- 94 Idaho 734
- 1972 Ida. LEXIS 325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in awarding alimony, due consideration should be given to the correlative needs and abilities of both parties
- in awarding alimony, due consideration should be given to the correlative needs and abilities of both parties
- “In ascertaining whether a given alimony award is just, the current philosophy of this court can be characterized as one of due consideration of the correlative needs and abilities of both parties.”
- “In ascertaining whether a given alimony award is just, the current philosophy of this court can be characterized as one of due consideration of the correlative needs and abilities of both parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakes, Towles, Dunlap, Maynard, Beebe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Simplot v. SimplotIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-13· cited 68×
- Donndelinger v. DonndelingerIdaho Court of Appeals· 1984-10-29· cited 38×
- Ziegler v. ZieglerIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-01-31· cited 32×
- McNett v. McNettIdaho Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 25×
- Murphey v. MurpheyIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-10-21· cited 25×
- Stansberry v. StansberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1978-05-23· cited 22×
- Koontz v. KoontzIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 14×
- Olsen v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-11-17· cited 11×
- Neveau v. NeveauIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-10-12· cited 11×
- Marmon v. MarmonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-02-04· cited 4×
- Hunt v. HuntIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-10-16· cited 3×
- Voss v. VossIdaho Court of Appeals· 2021-08-19· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Howay v. HowayIdaho Supreme Court· 1953-12-17· cited 41×
- Embree v. EmbreeIdaho Supreme Court· 1963-03-29· cited 35×
- Saviers v. SaviersIdaho Supreme Court· 1968-02-26· cited 30×
- Good v. GoodIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-05-28· cited 27×
- Brammer v. BrammerIdaho Supreme Court· 1970-06-26· cited 25×
- Sellars v. SellarsIdaho Supreme Court· 1952-10-07· cited 23×
- Meredith v. MeredithIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-11-22· cited 22×
- Clements v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-07-18· cited 16×
- Call v. MarlerIdaho Supreme Court· 1965-06-25· cited 16×
- Davis v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-06-29· cited 14×
- Turner v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court· 1966-01-31· cited 13×
- Losee v. LoseeIdaho Supreme Court· 1966-06-21· cited 12×
- Nichols v. NicholsIdaho Supreme Court· 1962-06-28· cited 12×
- Wyatt v. WyattIdaho Supreme Court· 1886-03-05· cited 12×
- United States v. CampIdaho Supreme Court· 1886-03-05· cited 11×
- Huskinson v. HuskinsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1969-04-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.