Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a witness “need not have personal knowledge of the actual creation of the document”
• concluding that actual notice sufficed
• “The custodian need not have personal knowledge of the actual creation of the document to lay a proper foundation.” (internal quotation omitted)
• although plaintiff did not comply with the notice requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 902 (11
• “A record of regularly conducted business activity would be eligible for admission as self-authenticating under [Federal Rules of Evidence] 901(11) and 803(6) if the record is accompanied by a written declaration of its custodian, or other qualified person.”
• in mortgage fraud scheme, holding admissible automatically-generated local application forms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).