Skip to main content

Shelton v. State

Citations

  • 59 So. 3d 248
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4343
  • 2011 WL 1135156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court permissibly commented on defendant's lack of remorse to explain why it lacked the ability to mitigate the sentence
  • holding sentence was proper where court’s comments regarding lack of remorse were merely a recognition that there was no basis to grant defendant's request for a reduced sentence
  • holding sentence was proper where court's comments regarding lack of remorse were merely a recognition that there was no basis to grant defendant’s request for a reduced sentence
  • holding sentence was proper where court's comments regarding lack of remorse were merely a recognition that there was no basis to grant defendant's request for a reduced sentence
  • \We perceive the court's comments regarding the defendant's lack of remorse as the court's recognition that it lacked any grounds to mitigate his sentence.\
  • “We perceive the court’s comments regarding the defendant’s lack of remorse as the court’s recognition that it lacked any grounds to mitigate his sentence. We see no evidence that the court used the defendant’s lack of remorse against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerber, Gross, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.