Skip to main content

Shelton v. State

Citations

  • 441 S.W.2d 536
  • 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the failure of the jury foreman to sign the verdict form had been called to the trial court's attention, the claimed error could have been corrected
  • holding that if the failure of the jury foreman to sign the verdict form had been called to the trial court’s attention, the claimed error could have been corrected
  • holding that if the failure of the jury foreman to sign the verdict hard object” goes unexplained. More importantly, we reasonably construe the latter (striking a hard ob ject) to encom pass the form er (hitting the floor and objects in a cashier’s stand
  • “The selection of another foreman by the jury of the penalty part of the trial does not show harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.