Skip to main content
· 5/17/1977

Shelstad v. Cook

Citations

  • 253 N.W.2d 517
  • 77 Wis. 2d 547
  • 1977 Wisc. LEXIS 1319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \[p]laintiffs special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiffs standing to pursue it\
  • explaining that \[p]laintiff's special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiff's standing to pursue it\
  • explaining that \[p]laintiff's special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiff's standing to pursue it\
  • \[T]he nature of the action must be determined as a whole and all allegations in the complaint may be considered.\
  • “[T]he nature of the action must be determined as a whole and all allegations in the complaint may be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.