· 5/17/1977
Shelstad v. Cook
Citations
- 253 N.W.2d 517
- 77 Wis. 2d 547
- 1977 Wisc. LEXIS 1319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \[p]laintiffs special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiffs standing to pursue it\
- explaining that \[p]laintiff's special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiff's standing to pursue it\
- explaining that \[p]laintiff's special relation to the corporation as a stockholder is intrinsic to the very nature of the [derivative claim] and thus a prerequisite to plaintiff's standing to pursue it\
- \[T]he nature of the action must be determined as a whole and all allegations in the complaint may be considered.\
- “[T]he nature of the action must be determined as a whole and all allegations in the complaint may be considered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.