Shelly v. Dobbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s “general reference to local real estate market does not establish the requisite business relationship” to support an intentional interference claim
• recognizing that a business \does not have a legally protectable relationship with every potential participant in their local market\
• “To establish a claim for outrage, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s conduct ‘(1) was intentional or reckless; (2) was extreme and outrageous; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).