Shelly L. Mann Robert W. Thorson, Beverly Kish, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Patrick J. Conlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judge’s acts of setting hearing dates and of collecting attorney’s fees were judicial acts
• holding that “there is no escaping the conclusion” that a judge’s orders placing conditions on a litigant’s ability to proceed in court was a judicial act
• holding that the argument that the district court should have allowed the plaintiffs to amend their com- plaint was not properly before the court of appeals because the plaintiffs never requested leave to amend their complaint
• describing examples of “administrative decisions by judges [] open to suit”
• abstained from granting equitable relief in section 1983 action challenging state court judge’s manner of conducting domestic relations cases
• “those [acts] that involve resolution of disputes between parties who have invoked the jurisdiction of a court” are judicial acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).