Skip to main content
· 2/3/1997

Shellhamer v. Shellhamer

Citations

  • 688 A.2d 1219
  • 455 Pa. Super. 526
  • 1997 Pa. Super. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that because the denial of a request for APL did not dispose of all claims in that the parties’ divorce was still pending, the order was not a final, appeal-able order and required the quashal of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Eakin, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.