· 2/3/1997
Shellhamer v. Shellhamer
Citations
- 688 A.2d 1219
- 455 Pa. Super. 526
- 1997 Pa. Super. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that because the denial of a request for APL did not dispose of all claims in that the parties’ divorce was still pending, the order was not a final, appeal-able order and required the quashal of the appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hudock, Eakin, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.