Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/9/1978
Shell Oil Co. v. Gutierrez
Citations
- 581 P.2d 271
- 119 Ariz. 426
- 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 534
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting manufacturer’s argument that inadequate labelling was not cause of injury because user did not read the warning given; jury could have concluded that label was too small and that larger, more conspicuous label would have been seen, read and heeded
- “The determination as to whether the supplier’s duty measured by these considerations has been reasonably discharged comes within the function of the trier of fact.”
- whether product is defective because of a failure to warn depends upon the negligence standards of foreseeability, seriousness, and cost of preventing
- whether product is defective because of a failure to warn depends upon the negligence standards of foreseeability, seriousness, and cost of preventing
- “Lack of access to the final form in which the product reaches the user is simply one of the considerations bearing upon the existence and extent of duty.”
- \determination as to whether the supplier's duty . . . has been reasonably discharge[d] comes within the function of the trier of fact.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 428×
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-14· cited 337×
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-16· cited 190×
- Bloxom v. BloxomSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-09-09· cited 167×
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 102×
- Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationSixth Circuit· 1984-07-02· cited 100×
- Natural Gas Odorizing, Inc. v. DownsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 69×
- Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-10-13· cited 63×
- Jarrell v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1988-10-07· cited 57×
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,906 Lauren David Thornton v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1994-06-08· cited 55×
- Bushong v. Garman Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-12-07· cited 54×
- Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-08· cited 45×
- Bliss v. TreeceArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-07· cited 39×
- Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van DuyneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-09-29· cited 39×
- Powers v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-04· cited 36×
- Kavanaugh v. KavanaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-22· cited 34×
- Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-21· cited 32×
- Kennedy v. Mobay Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-28· cited 27×
- Rutledge v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-23· cited 25×
- Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-19· cited 23×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1973-09-10· cited 466×
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1968-01-22· cited 165×
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.E.D. New York· 1972-05-18· cited 155×
- Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1976-03-29· cited 108×
- Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyThird Circuit· 1975-09-24· cited 97×
- First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-04-30· cited 79×
- Sterling Jackson v. Coast Paint and Lacquer Company, a Corporation, and Reliance Universal Incorporated, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1974-07-01· cited 76×
- West v. Broderick & Bascom Rope CompanySupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-04-13· cited 60×
- Anderson v. Klix Chemical Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-07-22· cited 52×
- DeSantis v. Parker Feeders, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1976-11-18· cited 26×
- Ulan v. RichtarsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-10-15· cited 25×
- Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 25×
- Walton v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Eighth Circuit· 1951-08-15· cited 22×
- Jacobson v. Colorado Fuel And Iron CorporationNinth Circuit· 1969-03-26· cited 17×
- Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-01-18· cited 17×
- Jansen v. LichwaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-10-06· cited 10×
- Hinson v. Phoenix Pie CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-06-29· cited 9×
- W. R. Skousen Contractor, Inc. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-02-26· cited 7×
- State v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.