Shell Oil Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding DR 7-104 does not extend to all current employees because that “would bar plaintiffs access to a vast number of potential witnesses who might have direct knowledge” of relevant facts
• permitting the plaintiff to interview all employees, including those at the GS 12-15 levels

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).