Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.”
• “Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.”
• “Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.”
• \Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.\ (citation omitted)
• \Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.\ (citation omitted)
• \Unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).