Sheley v. Kingsfort Bldrs., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Commerce has statutory authority “to treat a related exporter and importer as a single entity in order to prevent price or production manipulation.”
• stating that an “alleged response deficiency cannot support application of [AFA] where the information sought was apparently never requested”
• stating' that under pre-URAA law an “alleged response deficiency cannot support application of [best information available] where the information sought was apparently never requested”
• an “alleged response deficiency cannot support [the] application of BIA where the information sought was apparently never requested.”
• “It is ‘a general rule that agency must either conform itself to its prior decisions or explain the reasons for its departure.’ ”
• “alleged response deficiency cannot support application of [best information available] where the information sought was apparently never requested.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).