Skip to main content
· 6/18/1998

Sheldon P. KOTTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 146 F.3d 1056
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4672
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 6626
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12892
  • 1998 WL 318807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[misrepresentations are a fact of life in politics,” and “lobbying is the sine qua non of democracy”
  • stating that “intentional misrepresentation to government officials” is treated differently “outside of the political realm”
  • Explaining a heightened pleading 6 standard is employed when determining whether fraud or misrepresentations deprived 7 court proceedings of their legitimacy.
  • affirming the grant of a motion to dismiss premised 20 upon the Noerr-Pennington doctrine despite allegations of false statements
  • explaining the circumstances where the “sham” exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine is applicable
  • “litigation can be deemed a sham if a party’s knowing fraud upon, or its intentional misrepresentations to, the court deprive the litigation of its legitimacy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Tashima, Stagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.