Sheldon Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC Prudential Investment Management Services LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “Ta] District Court has discretion to deny a plaintiff leave to amend where the plaintiff was put on notice as to the deficiencies in his complaint, but chose not to resolve them”
• affirming district court's denial of leave to amend when plaintiff was on notice of the complaint’s deficiencies and failed to rectify them in his amended complaint
• finding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend for a second time where the plaintiff was on notice of the deficiencies in his complaint and failed to correct them in the first amended complaint
• finding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend for a second time where the plaintiff was on notice of the deficiencies in his complaint and failed to correct them in the first amended complaint
• affirming denial of leave to amend after the plaintiff “was on notice” of the complaint’s deficiencies and failed to cure them
• “A District Court has discretion to deny a plaintiff leave to amend where the plaintiff was put on notice as to the deficiencies in his complaint, but chose not to resolve them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).