Shelby Life Ins. Co. v. Paolasini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since, as Carroll holds, Shelby the insurer was entitled to rely on the truthfulness of the ‘flu’ response, the beneficiaries may not be heard to say that the carrier should have undertaken to determine whether there was some other unrevealed malady.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).