SHELBY COUNTY ALA. v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Congress did not renew the coverage formula to punish past sins, but rather because it found \substantial evidence of contemporary voting discrimination by the very same jurisdictions that had histories of unconstitutional conduct\
• describing section 5 actions against Mississippi and Waller County, Texas, \in which the unprecleared voting changes appeared to have been motivated by discriminatory animus\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).