Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/23/1989
Sheibels v. Estes Homes
Citations
- 778 P.2d 1299
- 161 Ariz. 403
- 28 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that in determining duration of implied warranty of fitness “standard to be applied to each factual situation is reasonableness”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lacagnina, Roll, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Heath v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-11-20· cited 30×
- Albano v. SHEA HOMES LTD. PARTNERSHIPArizona Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 22×
- Hershey v. Rich Rosen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-08-29· cited 9×
- City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-19· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 124×
- Barnes v. Mac Brown and Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 117×
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court· 1975-12-03· cited 81×
- Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-03· cited 71×
- Wagner Const. Co., Inc. v. NoonanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-05-13· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.