Sheffield v. Sheffield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where propounder and cross- propounder submitted substantially differing documents they claimed to be the testator’s will, jury had the authority to determine whether copy of will was the same as the original
• “In order for [a copy of a will] to be admitted to probate, it would have to be admitted under the rules of law . . . pertaining to the admission to probate of a copy of a lost or destroyed will.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Newton v. Higdon
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1970-09-10· cited 3×
• Tudor v. Bradford
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-03-25· cited 1×
• Jeffrey Dean Wilbur v. Patricia Floyd
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-02-06

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Nassau v. Sheffield
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1954-10-11· cited 2×