Sheffield v. Darby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements that a horse “ha[d] no problems” and “would make a good show horse” were mere expressions of opinion and did not constitute express warranties
• “A party may not justifiably rely on and assume to be true representations consisting of mere expressions of opinion, hope, expectation, puffing, and the like; rather, the party must inquire into and examine such representations to ascertain the truth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).