Skip to main content
· 9/3/2010

Sheffield v. City of Fort Thomas, Ky.

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 596
  • 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20236
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18437
  • 2010 WL 3447750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing Section 2 of the Kentucky Constitution and the Due Process Clause “in tandem”
  • construing Section 2 of the Kentucky Constitution and the Due Process Clause “in tandem”
  • “[T]o pass rational-basis scrutiny, ordinances need not be supported by scientific studies or empirical data; nor need they be effective in practice.”
  • allegations of disparate treatment amounting to “conclusory and unadorned assertions…are not well-pleaded, and not entitled to a presumption of truth” at the pleading stage of the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Boggs, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.